Back to Blog

EPC Map of Leeds with poor buildings in red and buildings with EPC of A and B in green.

The Business Case for EPC B

Summary

MEES regulations in England and Wales prohibit letting commercial properties below EPC E (April 2023), with proposed EPC B requirement by 2030. Only 8-9% of offices currently comply.

Property managers face a critical decision. At what point to invest to bring commercial or public buildings up to an EPC B?

The Business Case

The regulatory landscape for non-domestic buildings is shifting dramatically, and property managers who think they have until 2030 to worry about EPC B ratings might be in for a costly surprise. While the government's proposed timeline suggests a phased approach—EPC C by 2027, then B by 2030—the reality is that waiting until then could prove financially devastating.

The Current State of Play

Let's start with some sobering statistics.

  • Currently, only 8-9% of offices in England and Wales meet EPC B standards, meaning over 90% of office stock needs upgrades.

  • The retail sector fares slightly better at 10.9%, while industrial properties sit at 10.8%.

These figures aren't just numbers on a spreadsheet—they represent billions of pounds in required investment and potential stranded assets.

The minimum standards under MEES (Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards) already prohibit letting properties below EPC E, with fines reaching up to £150,000 for non-compliance. But the upcoming shift to EPC B represents a quantum leap in requirements that will affect the vast majority of commercial and public buildings.

The Financial Imperative: More Than Just Compliance

The business case for achieving EPC B goes beyond avoiding regulatory penalties. Properties that fail to meet evolving standards are starting to experience a "brown discount"—a measurable reduction in market value as buyers factor in the cost of necessary improvements. Conversely, buildings with strong energy ratings are beginning to command a "green premium" in both rental rates and capital values.

Consider this: a commercial property rated F or G cannot legally be leased in England and Wales as of April 2023. This transforms an income-producing asset into a liability that still incurs business rates, insurance, and maintenance costs while generating zero revenue. The financial impact is immediate and severe. For 2030 the challenge will be greater as many more buildings fall below this standard.

For asset managers, the equation is straightforward. Investing £50,000 in upgrades to secure an ongoing £100,000 annual lease is financially sound compared to facing void periods and potential fines. But the cost of improvements will only increase as we approach the deadlines.

The Timing Trap: Why 2030 is Too Late

Here's where many property managers could be getting their calculations wrong. While the government proposes EPC B by 2030, the practical reality suggests that waiting until then will be both expensive and potentially impossible.

Industry analysis indicates that if historic retrofit rates continue, roughly 60% of commercial properties will fail to meet EPC B by 2030 without significant intervention.

Even in prime locations like Central London, an estimated 58% of buildings were below EPC B as of 2022. This creates a perfect storm of demand and supply constraints.

As we approach the deadline, several factors will drive costs higher:

Contractor Availability: The construction industry will face unprecedented demand for retrofit work. With 85% of commercial buildings potentially needing upgrades, the skilled workforce simply won't exist to handle a last-minute rush.

Material Costs: Bulk purchasing of efficient heating systems, insulation materials, and LED lighting will drive prices higher as demand peaks.

Complexity of Improvements: The buildings that upgrade early will tackle the "low-hanging fruit"—simple improvements like lighting and basic controls. Properties that wait will need increasingly complex and expensive interventions.

Tenant Disruption: Leaving upgrades until the last minute means potentially disrupting existing tenants, which could trigger break clauses or require expensive temporary relocations.

The Competitive Advantage of Early Action

Property managers are already recognizing that early EPC improvements offer competitive advantages beyond compliance. Corporate tenants increasingly have their own net-zero commitments and actively seek energy-efficient premises. In some recent high-profile leasing deals, sustainability credentials have become as important as rental rates.

One major London law firm recently indicated that building sustainability was their top concern in lease negotiations—ranking above rental cost. This shift in tenant priorities means that EPC B buildings may not just avoid penalties but could command premium rents and enjoy higher occupancy rates.

Regional Variations and Portfolio Considerations

The challenge varies significantly by region and property type. The South West leads with 9.6% of offices already at EPC B, while the West Midlands has only 6.8%. For industrial properties, the East Midlands—a hub for modern logistics—has 13% at EPC B, compared to under 9% in Wales.

These regional variations matter for portfolio management. Properties in areas with lower current compliance rates may face even greater cost pressures as local contractors become overwhelmed with demand.

There is help to map your EPC journey and lower energy costs

Before confirming investment and upgrades, property managers can understand the EPC landscape around their properties and prioritise energy savings.

  1. OptimiseAI's free EPC Map provides a good starting point, allowing you to visualize your portfolio's current performance and identify priority assets for improvement.

  2. Use the Predict platform which can establish a roadmap of cost effective energy savings across your estate.

The Path Forward

The transition to EPC B isn't just about compliance—it's about lowering cost and winning tenants in an increasingly carbon-conscious market.

The window for cost-effective improvements is narrowing. Property managers who act now can spread costs over several years, plan improvements around lease renewals, and avoid the premium pricing that will inevitably emerge as deadlines approach.

The question isn't whether to upgrade to EPC B—it's whether to do it strategically now or scramble to comply later at higher costs.

Optimised energy management of non-domestic buildings.

EMAIL US

Back to Blog

EPC Map of Leeds with poor buildings in red and buildings with EPC of A and B in green.
EPC Map of Leeds with poor buildings in red and buildings with EPC of A and B in green.

The Business Case for EPC B

Summary

MEES regulations in England and Wales prohibit letting commercial properties below EPC E (April 2023), with proposed EPC B requirement by 2030. Only 8-9% of offices currently comply.

Property managers face a critical decision. At what point to invest to bring commercial or public buildings up to an EPC B?

The Business Case

The regulatory landscape for non-domestic buildings is shifting dramatically, and property managers who think they have until 2030 to worry about EPC B ratings might be in for a costly surprise. While the government's proposed timeline suggests a phased approach—EPC C by 2027, then B by 2030—the reality is that waiting until then could prove financially devastating.

The Current State of Play

Let's start with some sobering statistics.

  • Currently, only 8-9% of offices in England and Wales meet EPC B standards, meaning over 90% of office stock needs upgrades.

  • The retail sector fares slightly better at 10.9%, while industrial properties sit at 10.8%.

These figures aren't just numbers on a spreadsheet—they represent billions of pounds in required investment and potential stranded assets.

The minimum standards under MEES (Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards) already prohibit letting properties below EPC E, with fines reaching up to £150,000 for non-compliance. But the upcoming shift to EPC B represents a quantum leap in requirements that will affect the vast majority of commercial and public buildings.

The Financial Imperative: More Than Just Compliance

The business case for achieving EPC B goes beyond avoiding regulatory penalties. Properties that fail to meet evolving standards are starting to experience a "brown discount"—a measurable reduction in market value as buyers factor in the cost of necessary improvements. Conversely, buildings with strong energy ratings are beginning to command a "green premium" in both rental rates and capital values.

Consider this: a commercial property rated F or G cannot legally be leased in England and Wales as of April 2023. This transforms an income-producing asset into a liability that still incurs business rates, insurance, and maintenance costs while generating zero revenue. The financial impact is immediate and severe. For 2030 the challenge will be greater as many more buildings fall below this standard.

For asset managers, the equation is straightforward. Investing £50,000 in upgrades to secure an ongoing £100,000 annual lease is financially sound compared to facing void periods and potential fines. But the cost of improvements will only increase as we approach the deadlines.

The Timing Trap: Why 2030 is Too Late

Here's where many property managers could be getting their calculations wrong. While the government proposes EPC B by 2030, the practical reality suggests that waiting until then will be both expensive and potentially impossible.

Industry analysis indicates that if historic retrofit rates continue, roughly 60% of commercial properties will fail to meet EPC B by 2030 without significant intervention.

Even in prime locations like Central London, an estimated 58% of buildings were below EPC B as of 2022. This creates a perfect storm of demand and supply constraints.

As we approach the deadline, several factors will drive costs higher:

Contractor Availability: The construction industry will face unprecedented demand for retrofit work. With 85% of commercial buildings potentially needing upgrades, the skilled workforce simply won't exist to handle a last-minute rush.

Material Costs: Bulk purchasing of efficient heating systems, insulation materials, and LED lighting will drive prices higher as demand peaks.

Complexity of Improvements: The buildings that upgrade early will tackle the "low-hanging fruit"—simple improvements like lighting and basic controls. Properties that wait will need increasingly complex and expensive interventions.

Tenant Disruption: Leaving upgrades until the last minute means potentially disrupting existing tenants, which could trigger break clauses or require expensive temporary relocations.

The Competitive Advantage of Early Action

Property managers are already recognizing that early EPC improvements offer competitive advantages beyond compliance. Corporate tenants increasingly have their own net-zero commitments and actively seek energy-efficient premises. In some recent high-profile leasing deals, sustainability credentials have become as important as rental rates.

One major London law firm recently indicated that building sustainability was their top concern in lease negotiations—ranking above rental cost. This shift in tenant priorities means that EPC B buildings may not just avoid penalties but could command premium rents and enjoy higher occupancy rates.

Regional Variations and Portfolio Considerations

The challenge varies significantly by region and property type. The South West leads with 9.6% of offices already at EPC B, while the West Midlands has only 6.8%. For industrial properties, the East Midlands—a hub for modern logistics—has 13% at EPC B, compared to under 9% in Wales.

These regional variations matter for portfolio management. Properties in areas with lower current compliance rates may face even greater cost pressures as local contractors become overwhelmed with demand.

There is help to map your EPC journey and lower energy costs

Before confirming investment and upgrades, property managers can understand the EPC landscape around their properties and prioritise energy savings.

  1. OptimiseAI's free EPC Map provides a good starting point, allowing you to visualize your portfolio's current performance and identify priority assets for improvement.

  2. Use the Predict platform which can establish a roadmap of cost effective energy savings across your estate.

The Path Forward

The transition to EPC B isn't just about compliance—it's about lowering cost and winning tenants in an increasingly carbon-conscious market.

The window for cost-effective improvements is narrowing. Property managers who act now can spread costs over several years, plan improvements around lease renewals, and avoid the premium pricing that will inevitably emerge as deadlines approach.

The question isn't whether to upgrade to EPC B—it's whether to do it strategically now or scramble to comply later at higher costs.

Optimised energy management of non-domestic buildings.

EMAIL US

Optimised energy management of non-domestic buildings.

EMAIL US

Back to Blog

EPC Map of Leeds with poor buildings in red and buildings with EPC of A and B in green.
EPC Map of Leeds with poor buildings in red and buildings with EPC of A and B in green.

The Business Case for EPC B

Summary

MEES regulations in England and Wales prohibit letting commercial properties below EPC E (April 2023), with proposed EPC B requirement by 2030. Only 8-9% of offices currently comply.

Property managers face a critical decision. At what point to invest to bring commercial or public buildings up to an EPC B?

The Business Case

The regulatory landscape for non-domestic buildings is shifting dramatically, and property managers who think they have until 2030 to worry about EPC B ratings might be in for a costly surprise. While the government's proposed timeline suggests a phased approach—EPC C by 2027, then B by 2030—the reality is that waiting until then could prove financially devastating.

The Current State of Play

Let's start with some sobering statistics.

  • Currently, only 8-9% of offices in England and Wales meet EPC B standards, meaning over 90% of office stock needs upgrades.

  • The retail sector fares slightly better at 10.9%, while industrial properties sit at 10.8%.

These figures aren't just numbers on a spreadsheet—they represent billions of pounds in required investment and potential stranded assets.

The minimum standards under MEES (Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards) already prohibit letting properties below EPC E, with fines reaching up to £150,000 for non-compliance. But the upcoming shift to EPC B represents a quantum leap in requirements that will affect the vast majority of commercial and public buildings.

The Financial Imperative: More Than Just Compliance

The business case for achieving EPC B goes beyond avoiding regulatory penalties. Properties that fail to meet evolving standards are starting to experience a "brown discount"—a measurable reduction in market value as buyers factor in the cost of necessary improvements. Conversely, buildings with strong energy ratings are beginning to command a "green premium" in both rental rates and capital values.

Consider this: a commercial property rated F or G cannot legally be leased in England and Wales as of April 2023. This transforms an income-producing asset into a liability that still incurs business rates, insurance, and maintenance costs while generating zero revenue. The financial impact is immediate and severe. For 2030 the challenge will be greater as many more buildings fall below this standard.

For asset managers, the equation is straightforward. Investing £50,000 in upgrades to secure an ongoing £100,000 annual lease is financially sound compared to facing void periods and potential fines. But the cost of improvements will only increase as we approach the deadlines.

The Timing Trap: Why 2030 is Too Late

Here's where many property managers could be getting their calculations wrong. While the government proposes EPC B by 2030, the practical reality suggests that waiting until then will be both expensive and potentially impossible.

Industry analysis indicates that if historic retrofit rates continue, roughly 60% of commercial properties will fail to meet EPC B by 2030 without significant intervention.

Even in prime locations like Central London, an estimated 58% of buildings were below EPC B as of 2022. This creates a perfect storm of demand and supply constraints.

As we approach the deadline, several factors will drive costs higher:

Contractor Availability: The construction industry will face unprecedented demand for retrofit work. With 85% of commercial buildings potentially needing upgrades, the skilled workforce simply won't exist to handle a last-minute rush.

Material Costs: Bulk purchasing of efficient heating systems, insulation materials, and LED lighting will drive prices higher as demand peaks.

Complexity of Improvements: The buildings that upgrade early will tackle the "low-hanging fruit"—simple improvements like lighting and basic controls. Properties that wait will need increasingly complex and expensive interventions.

Tenant Disruption: Leaving upgrades until the last minute means potentially disrupting existing tenants, which could trigger break clauses or require expensive temporary relocations.

The Competitive Advantage of Early Action

Property managers are already recognizing that early EPC improvements offer competitive advantages beyond compliance. Corporate tenants increasingly have their own net-zero commitments and actively seek energy-efficient premises. In some recent high-profile leasing deals, sustainability credentials have become as important as rental rates.

One major London law firm recently indicated that building sustainability was their top concern in lease negotiations—ranking above rental cost. This shift in tenant priorities means that EPC B buildings may not just avoid penalties but could command premium rents and enjoy higher occupancy rates.

Regional Variations and Portfolio Considerations

The challenge varies significantly by region and property type. The South West leads with 9.6% of offices already at EPC B, while the West Midlands has only 6.8%. For industrial properties, the East Midlands—a hub for modern logistics—has 13% at EPC B, compared to under 9% in Wales.

These regional variations matter for portfolio management. Properties in areas with lower current compliance rates may face even greater cost pressures as local contractors become overwhelmed with demand.

There is help to map your EPC journey and lower energy costs

Before confirming investment and upgrades, property managers can understand the EPC landscape around their properties and prioritise energy savings.

  1. OptimiseAI's free EPC Map provides a good starting point, allowing you to visualize your portfolio's current performance and identify priority assets for improvement.

  2. Use the Predict platform which can establish a roadmap of cost effective energy savings across your estate.

The Path Forward

The transition to EPC B isn't just about compliance—it's about lowering cost and winning tenants in an increasingly carbon-conscious market.

The window for cost-effective improvements is narrowing. Property managers who act now can spread costs over several years, plan improvements around lease renewals, and avoid the premium pricing that will inevitably emerge as deadlines approach.

The question isn't whether to upgrade to EPC B—it's whether to do it strategically now or scramble to comply later at higher costs.

Optimised energy management of non-domestic buildings.

EMAIL US

Optimised energy management of non-domestic buildings.

EMAIL US